ATI vs Nvidia

Sit yourselves down in here and have a chinwag about whatever takes your fancy.

Moderator: Dream17 Staff

Post Reply
User avatar
FW
Former Staffmember
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Markham, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

ATI vs Nvidia

Post by FW » Sun Mar 13, 2005 7:23 pm

Which company do you prefer better?

User avatar
Cyclaws
Former Staffmember
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: London, England
Contact:

Post by Cyclaws » Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:25 pm

I prefer Nvidia, just because I am used to them. You also see their logo on a lot of games.
Webmaster of WormsTournaments: http://www.wormstournaments.co.uk
Creator of my blog: http://www.kevinstreetonline.com
Worms Corrispondent for Dream17: cyclaws@dream17.info

User avatar
Joseph
Newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:45 am
Location: Osaka
Contact:

Post by Joseph » Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:41 am

I'd generally say nVidia, but some of the Radeon's I've seen performing at PC shops recently, I could be turned.

User avatar
Alex
Settled in
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:10 pm

Post by Alex » Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:18 am

Depends which generation of card.

In the DirectX 9.0a/9.0b generation, ATi all the way. The FX range of nVidia cards suck, to be plain, the cock. The ATi cards for the same price are MUCH better. Especially in pixel shader heavy games.

With the DirectX 9.0c generation, nVidia have actually made a decent card, like they did back in the day of the GeForce 3. It's very impressive. It's pretty much personal preference now - Some people say the nVidia GeForce 6 range is better because it has Pixel Shader 3.0 while the ATi equivelants only have 2.0, but hardly any games use 3.0, and those that use it heavily will lag the nVidia cards to hell because by the time heavy use of 3.0 comes out, the current nVidia cards will be old.
Image

^^ CURSE YOU PHPBB!

M3ntal
Newbie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:36 am
Location: Huddersfield, UK
Contact:

Post by M3ntal » Mon Mar 14, 2005 6:58 pm

Overall, ATi.
It really depends which month it is as to which company has the best card out, because they keep leapfroggin each other, but ATi colours are richer, and image quality better.
Ben Paddon is a Horse.

User avatar
FW
Former Staffmember
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:52 am
Location: Markham, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Post by FW » Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:41 am

If you ask me which company I prefer, which you probably won't. It's more of a 50%/50% liking of both companies for me. I Like NVIDIA because of the easy stable ability from the cards, and I like ATI because their cards produce realistic quality.

User avatar
Alex
Settled in
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:10 pm

Post by Alex » Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:10 am

FW wrote:If you ask me which company I prefer, which you probably won't. It's more of a 50%/50% liking of both companies for me. I Like NVIDIA because of the easy stable ability from the cards, and I like ATI because their cards produce realistic quality.
ATi's cards are just as stable.

The only real problem with ATi (assuming you're using it in Windows) is that their drivers sometimes have problems (I've experienced a few). Under Windows that's rare though.


(Under Linux, nVidia is far superior because the ATi Linux drivers suck ass compared to the nVidia ones).
Image

^^ CURSE YOU PHPBB!

MtlAngelus
Settled in
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:18 am
Location: Yes.

Post by MtlAngelus » Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:42 pm

I prefer ATI for no apparent reason.

ThreeHeadedMonkey
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 7:59 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re:

Post by ThreeHeadedMonkey » Tue Mar 22, 2005 8:13 am

Ah, the age-old topic concerning ATi/nVidia...

Personally, I use nVidia, mainly. It's a matter of personal preference. In terms of performance, there's no big difference.

Use whichever you prefer (and your budget allows), I'd say.

User avatar
Scarface
Newbie
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:43 am
Location: Leeds/England
Contact:

Post by Scarface » Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:08 am

I prfer nVidia simply because I use their XFX 6600GT card which I got after hearing nothing but good news about it!

User avatar
MonkeyforaHead
Newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: In a big ol' box I stole from Nutter
Contact:

Post by MonkeyforaHead » Tue May 24, 2005 11:12 pm

ATI. My crappy nVidia card was barely enough to hold the computer together, and now that I've got a Radeon 9200, things are going quite a bit more smoothly.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Zeor
Senior
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 3:21 am
Location: Science and Outer Space

Post by Zeor » Tue May 31, 2005 1:15 am

It's hardly fair to consider ATI superior because your NVidia one was so much lower-spec...
Zero72, Team17 Forum member (and former Cartoonist), June 2002 - June 2013.

Zeor TV - [fart noise]!

User avatar
Run
Fan of Excellence
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:30 pm
Location: Exeter Uni / Balsall Common
Contact:

Post by Run » Tue May 31, 2005 10:51 am

Which ever one is the less greedy, filthy, underhanded corporation. Until I find out which I don't care as long as my computer turns on in the morning.
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"

Post Reply