The "Chris Sawyer" Model
Moderator: Dream17 Staff
- Paul.Power
- He Rocketh So
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 12:09 pm
- Location: Swansea
The "Chris Sawyer" Model
It's interesting to note, looking back at all those games on Lemon Amiga, how many of them were produced on what I'll call the "Chris Sawyer" model of game development: i.e., have as few people on the development team as possible (Sawyer seems to be pretty much the last of this breed).
Taking Jimmy White's Whirlwind Snooker (a very fun game, I had the PC version), for example, it seems that Archer Maclean was determined to do practically everything on his own, designing, programming, drawing, composing... There are less extreme examples, of course, but many old games had teams of less than five people on them.
This is of course often a good thing (as Sawyer points out in his introduction to Locomotion, "I think many game designs suffer from having too many people working on them, losing their individual character and becming games that look and play like so many others"), but it's interesting to see how so many games companies seem to have moved away from this way of doing things. All the big names behind the games we know and love seem to have been relegated either to roles as members of larger teams, or to "advisors".
Of course, larger teams typically lead to more polished titles (there are one or two really weird flaws in Locomotion), but do/did smaller teams make games more innovative, interesting and just plain fun?
Taking Jimmy White's Whirlwind Snooker (a very fun game, I had the PC version), for example, it seems that Archer Maclean was determined to do practically everything on his own, designing, programming, drawing, composing... There are less extreme examples, of course, but many old games had teams of less than five people on them.
This is of course often a good thing (as Sawyer points out in his introduction to Locomotion, "I think many game designs suffer from having too many people working on them, losing their individual character and becming games that look and play like so many others"), but it's interesting to see how so many games companies seem to have moved away from this way of doing things. All the big names behind the games we know and love seem to have been relegated either to roles as members of larger teams, or to "advisors".
Of course, larger teams typically lead to more polished titles (there are one or two really weird flaws in Locomotion), but do/did smaller teams make games more innovative, interesting and just plain fun?
"Spam is the filling in the sandwich of forum life"
Here, have some Let's Plays: Advance Wars 2 | Advance Wars
Here, have some Let's Plays: Advance Wars 2 | Advance Wars
- Paul.Power
- He Rocketh So
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 12:09 pm
- Location: Swansea
Unless of course your name is Chris Sawyer. But then, he takes an absolute age to bring out new games because his "team" is so small.
"Spam is the filling in the sandwich of forum life"
Here, have some Let's Plays: Advance Wars 2 | Advance Wars
Here, have some Let's Plays: Advance Wars 2 | Advance Wars
- Squirminator2k
- Dream17 Founder
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:07 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
May be interesting to note that Developers of Mobile Phone games do generally consist of smaller teams, just like the Old Days. While for the most part we seem to be getting ports of (or games based on) existing titles such as Lemmings, Worms, Tetris, Pac-Man, etc. there are occasional developments, such as some titles by MacroSpace and Rockpool Games, that are fully polished original titles.
An example of this is Worms Golf. While most 2D Golfing titles stick to a top-down or psuedo-3D view, Worms Golf uses the side-on view (from Worms, obviously) and it plays very well. While hardly 100% original, it is an interesting concept. Some Mobile games are actually better quality than the commercially released PC/Console games we seem to be saturated with.
An example of this is Worms Golf. While most 2D Golfing titles stick to a top-down or psuedo-3D view, Worms Golf uses the side-on view (from Worms, obviously) and it plays very well. While hardly 100% original, it is an interesting concept. Some Mobile games are actually better quality than the commercially released PC/Console games we seem to be saturated with.
PortsCenter - Gaming's forgotten history. A show all about unique video game ports.
Back in the day, to know how to write a game you just had to know how to take the input from the keyboard, make beeping noises on PC speaker, and slap 8 bit sprites onto the screen. Today, you need to understand vector algebra just to slap a lit triangle onto the screen. If you want to write a game all by yourself you need to know how to write physics simulations, including collision code, know how to do quick approximation for different lighting conditions, do particle effects, design the database, handle networking, work with memory allocation, understand a few dosens of different file structures, know how to work with the OS and how to use a few of the more common libraries for graphics, sounds, and networking, and then you need to know how to write optimized code for all of that. There are still people who can do all that, but these people are few, and every game dev company wants one of these people, so they tend to end up working for huge development companies instead of working on their own, unique games.Alex wrote:It's a pity that "bedroom coders" just cannot exist anymore. It just doesn't work in the industry (not to a large scale anyway). I mean hell, look at Worms - Andy anyone?
None of my projects (Minus One converter, W3D/W4 Map Viewer, and WMapEditor) are endorsed, supported or otherwise affiliated with Dream17. I just find Dream17 forums to be a nice place to share and discuss my work with others.
- Run
- Fan of Excellence
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: Exeter Uni / Balsall Common
- Contact:
I'd suspect that smaller teams create games with fewer bugs because they all know the code and have consistent code. Then again it could be because the games are simpler...
I want to play RollerCoaster Tycoon now. Has anyone here managed to get it working on XP?
I want to play RollerCoaster Tycoon now. Has anyone here managed to get it working on XP?
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"
- Squirminator2k
- Dream17 Founder
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:07 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
The original? Yes. I have it installed on this PC.
PortsCenter - Gaming's forgotten history. A show all about unique video game ports.
- Run
- Fan of Excellence
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: Exeter Uni / Balsall Common
- Contact:
Wooo! I wasn't prepared for that - in thousands of people who haven't got it working I've only seen a few who have.
When I get home from uni and have my disk with me once more I shall have to contact you about this
When I get home from uni and have my disk with me once more I shall have to contact you about this
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"
- Squirminator2k
- Dream17 Founder
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:07 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Which version of XP are you running?
PortsCenter - Gaming's forgotten history. A show all about unique video game ports.
- Run
- Fan of Excellence
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: Exeter Uni / Balsall Common
- Contact:
Windows XP Home Edition version 2002
I'm not exactly sure what version my RCT is... but I did get it very shortly after it came out so it's probably original. I'm pretty sure it's a European version too. I shall find this all out when at home.
I'm not exactly sure what version my RCT is... but I did get it very shortly after it came out so it's probably original. I'm pretty sure it's a European version too. I shall find this all out when at home.
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"
Just run it in compatibility mode. It should work. I am yet to see a game that won't run under the XP in compatibility mode or under DOS after booted from a floppy. Though, if you are running DOS, you better have a FAT 32 partition on your PC.
None of my projects (Minus One converter, W3D/W4 Map Viewer, and WMapEditor) are endorsed, supported or otherwise affiliated with Dream17. I just find Dream17 forums to be a nice place to share and discuss my work with others.
- Run
- Fan of Excellence
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: Exeter Uni / Balsall Common
- Contact:
You say that as though it works. I tried extensively to get it to work, with a variety of patches and crap, compatibility mode fiddling, all sorts.
When I get home, I need a thorough step-by-step guide, and then I'll try it off a reformatted PC (i plan to reformat soon anyway)
When I get home, I need a thorough step-by-step guide, and then I'll try it off a reformatted PC (i plan to reformat soon anyway)
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"
- Squirminator2k
- Dream17 Founder
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:07 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
I managed to get it to work by setting it to Win98/ME compatibility, and disabling Visual Themes. It works fine.
PortsCenter - Gaming's forgotten history. A show all about unique video game ports.
- Paul.Power
- He Rocketh So
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 12:09 pm
- Location: Swansea
Locomotion has one glaring design fault though. By taking out the depots from Transport Tycoon (presumably to make vehicle deployment simpler), he's removed the ability to provide maintainance for vehicles. This means that vehicle reliability drops far more rapidly than in TT, and you find yourself replacing stuff every 6-8 game years rather than every 12-14 game years. This gets annoying very rapidly, particularly with my approach ("Tramways ROCK! Let's build absurd numbers of tramways!").Run wrote:I'd suspect that smaller teams create games with fewer bugs because they all know the code and have consistent code. Then again it could be because the games are simpler...
I want to play RollerCoaster Tycoon now. Has anyone here managed to get it working on XP?
EDIT: Replaced "they've" with "he's". Paul, remember thread topic.
Last edited by Paul.Power on Tue Jun 07, 2005 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Spam is the filling in the sandwich of forum life"
Here, have some Let's Plays: Advance Wars 2 | Advance Wars
Here, have some Let's Plays: Advance Wars 2 | Advance Wars
yeah, it's ironic. in an attempt to make things easier, he did the exact opposite. i just got fed up with replacing and let them rot ("What do I care if my vehicles can't move through a square without breaking down? I'm a freaking billionaire!").Paul.Power wrote:Locomotion has one glaring design fault though. By taking out the depots from Transport Tycoon (presumably to make vehicle deployment simpler), they've removed the ability to provide maintainance for vehicles. This means that vehicle reliability drops far more rapidly than in TT, and you find yourself replacing stuff every 6-8 game years rather than every 12-14 game years. This gets annoying very rapidly, particularly with my approach ("Tramways ROCK! Let's build absurd numbers of tramways!").Run wrote:I'd suspect that smaller teams create games with fewer bugs because they all know the code and have consistent code. Then again it could be because the games are simpler...
I want to play RollerCoaster Tycoon now. Has anyone here managed to get it working on XP?
i also got annoyed how roads remained so limited, while rails can have all sorts of curves and junctions. roads need love too, you know.
Team17 Forum Refugee | OpenXcom Developer
- Run
- Fan of Excellence
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:30 pm
- Location: Exeter Uni / Balsall Common
- Contact:
So far I've tried:Squirminator2k wrote:I managed to get it to work by setting it to Win98/ME compatibility, and disabling Visual Themes. It works fine.
1/ Running both setup.exe and rct.exe under compatbility mode for Windows 95
2/ Running both setup.exe and rct.exe under compatbility mode for Windows 98/ME
3/ Running both setup.exe and rct.exe without any compatability mode
They all produce the same error when trying to run the game (see below) except that the blue Loading screen for RCT only appears with 1/ and 3/. So 98/ME compatbility mode looks promising in that it's the exception.
The error I get is the typical Microsoft "report this error" window, and it seems to be complaining about my "rct.ICD" file. Could it be that that is corrupt, or something? Windows calls it an "unknown application" and its size is 6,007,808 bytes.
There's supposed to be a patch somewhere on the internet for rct, though i never had success with it. Did you use that or simply use the original CD and nothing more?
Meanwhile, *cries*
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"